Is Alex Lange Better Than Matt Gage? MLB Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Alex Lange and Matt Gage split the statistical categories evenly — 2 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested RP comparisons in MLB history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Matt Gage's Losses of 3 compared to Alex Lange's 22 represents a 633.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Matt Gage's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is ERA, where Alex Lange posts 4.52 against Matt Gage's 3.69 — a gap of just 22.5%. Matt Gage can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 2-2 tally suggests. In any debate, ERA is the statistical ammunition for the Matt Gage side.

Relief pitching is evaluated differently than starting pitching — ERA and saves matter most for closers, while WHIP and strikeout rate define setup men. Career totals reflect longevity in a high-stress role.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Matt Gage claims the tiebreaker through Losses advantage — a 633.3% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this MLB debate.