Andrew Kittredge or Josh Hader? The MLB Stat Breakdown
The career statistics tell a clear story in this RP comparison. Josh Hader holds the advantage in 4 of 5 key categories, with Losses representing the most decisive gap — a 83.3% difference that separates these two MLB players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Andrew Kittredge's Losses of 18 compared to Josh Hader's 33 represents a 83.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Andrew Kittredge's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Wins, where Andrew Kittredge posts 30 against Josh Hader's 38 — a gap of just 26.7%. Andrew Kittredge can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Wins is the statistical ammunition for the Andrew Kittredge side.
Relief pitching is evaluated differently than starting pitching — ERA and saves matter most for closers, while WHIP and strikeout rate define setup men. Career totals reflect longevity in a high-stress role.
Josh Hader wins this head to head comparison decisively — 4 categories to 1. The 83.3% gap in Losses alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Josh Hader's statistical superiority in this MLB career comparison.
Who is better, Andrew Kittredge or Josh Hader?
Josh Hader holds the statistical edge, winning 4 of 5 categories in this career comparison. Josh Hader's Losses of 18 versus Andrew Kittredge's 33 is the most decisive factor — a 83.3% difference.
How do Andrew Kittredge and Josh Hader compare in Losses?
Andrew Kittredge career Losses: 18. Josh Hader career Losses: 33. Andrew Kittredge leads by 83.3% — dramatically ahead in this key RP metric.
Who had the better overall career, Andrew Kittredge or Josh Hader?
Based on career statistics, Josh Hader edges Andrew Kittredge 4-1 across key categories. Josh Hader's Losses of 18 leads Andrew Kittredge's 33 by 83.3%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
