Is Andrew Kittredge Better Than Matt Gage? MLB Stats Decide

The career statistics tell a clear story in this RP comparison. Andrew Kittredge holds the advantage in 4 of 5 key categories, with Wins representing the most decisive gap — a 650% difference that separates these two MLB players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Andrew Kittredge's Wins of 30 compared to Matt Gage's 4 represents a 650% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Andrew Kittredge's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is ERA, where Andrew Kittredge posts 3.44 against Matt Gage's 3.69 — a gap of just 7.3%. Matt Gage can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-1 tally suggests. In any debate, ERA is the statistical ammunition for the Matt Gage side.

Relief pitching is evaluated differently than starting pitching — ERA and saves matter most for closers, while WHIP and strikeout rate define setup men. Career totals reflect longevity in a high-stress role.

Andrew Kittredge wins this head to head comparison decisively — 4 categories to 1. The 650% gap in Wins alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Andrew Kittredge's statistical superiority in this MLB career comparison.