Aaron Brooks or Anzejs Pasecniks? The NBA Stat Breakdown

This is as close as it gets. Aaron Brooks and Anzejs Pasecniks split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Anzejs Pasecniks's Assists Per Game of 19 compared to Aaron Brooks's 3.0 represents a 533.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Aaron Brooks falls 6.3% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while Anzejs Pasecniks exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Anzejs Pasecniks's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Aaron Brooks posts 41.3% against Anzejs Pasecniks's 52.1% — a gap of just 26.2%. Anzejs Pasecniks can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Anzejs Pasecniks side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Anzejs Pasecniks claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 533.3% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.