Aaron Brooks vs Brian Cook: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Aaron Brooks and Brian Cook split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Aaron Brooks's Assists Per Game of 3.0 compared to Brian Cook's 0.6 represents a 400% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Brian Cook falls 81.3% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while Aaron Brooks exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Aaron Brooks's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Aaron Brooks posts 37% against Brian Cook's 38.2% — a gap of just 3.2%. Brian Cook can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Brian Cook side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Aaron Brooks claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 400% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.