Is Aaron Brooks Better Than Greg Anderson? NBA Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Aaron Brooks and Greg Anderson split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Aaron Brooks's Three Point % of 37% compared to Greg Anderson's 4.0% represents a 825% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Aaron Brooks's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Steals Per Game, where Aaron Brooks posts 0.6 against Greg Anderson's 0.7 — a gap of just 16.7%. Greg Anderson can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Steals Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Greg Anderson side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Aaron Brooks claims the tiebreaker through Three Point % advantage — a 825% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.