Aaron Brooks or Ryan Arcidiacono? The NBA Stat Breakdown

The career statistics tell a clear story in this G comparison. Aaron Brooks holds the advantage in 7 of 8 key categories, with Points Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 106.4% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Aaron Brooks's Points Per Game of 9.7 compared to Ryan Arcidiacono's 4.7 represents a 106.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Ryan Arcidiacono falls 68.2% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Aaron Brooks exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Aaron Brooks's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Aaron Brooks posts 41.3% against Ryan Arcidiacono's 36.0% — a gap of just 14.7%. Ryan Arcidiacono can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 7-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Ryan Arcidiacono side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Aaron Brooks wins this head to head comparison decisively — 7 categories to 1. The 106.4% gap in Points Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Aaron Brooks's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.