Aaron Gray vs Ken Bannister Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Aaron Gray and Ken Bannister split the statistical categories evenly — 3 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Ken Bannister's Points Per Game of 5.9 compared to Aaron Gray's 3.2 represents a 84.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Aaron Gray falls 78.4% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Ken Bannister exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Ken Bannister's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Aaron Gray posts 51.0% against Ken Bannister's 52.0% — a gap of just 2%. Ken Bannister can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Ken Bannister side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Ken Bannister claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 84.4% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.