Comparing Aaron Harrison and Vander Blue Head to Head

This is as close as it gets. Aaron Harrison and Vander Blue split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Vander Blue's Assists Per Game of 1.3 compared to Aaron Harrison's 0.4 represents a 225% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Aaron Harrison falls 87.5% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while Vander Blue exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Vander Blue's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Rebounds Per Game, where Aaron Harrison posts 1.2 against Vander Blue's 1.3 — a gap of just 8.3%. Vander Blue can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Rebounds Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Vander Blue side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Vander Blue claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 225% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.