Aaron McKie vs Allonzo Trier: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Aaron McKie and Allonzo Trier split the statistical categories evenly — 3 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested SG comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Allonzo Trier's Points Per Game of 10.9 compared to Aaron McKie's 7.4 represents a 47.3% advantage — significantly better than their counterpart in this critical category. Aaron McKie falls 50% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Allonzo Trier exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Allonzo Trier's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Aaron McKie posts 43.8% against Allonzo Trier's 43.9% — virtually identical figures. Allonzo Trier can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Allonzo Trier side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Allonzo Trier claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 47.3% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.