Aaron McKie vs Richard Hamilton Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Aaron McKie and Richard Hamilton split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested SG comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Richard Hamilton's Points Per Game of 17.1 compared to Aaron McKie's 7.4 represents a 131.1% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Aaron McKie falls 50% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Richard Hamilton exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Richard Hamilton's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Aaron McKie posts 35% against Richard Hamilton's 34.6% — a gap of just 1.2%. Richard Hamilton can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Richard Hamilton side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Richard Hamilton claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 131.1% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.