Aaron McKie vs Taylor Hendricks Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Aaron McKie and Taylor Hendricks split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested SG comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Aaron McKie's Assists Per Game of 2.7 compared to Taylor Hendricks's 0.9 represents a 200% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Taylor Hendricks falls 71.9% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while Aaron McKie exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Aaron McKie's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Aaron McKie posts 35% against Taylor Hendricks's 35.4% — a gap of just 1.1%. Taylor Hendricks can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Taylor Hendricks side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Aaron McKie claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 200% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.