Is Aaron Wiggins Better Than De'Aaron Fox? NBA Stats Decide

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Aaron Wiggins vs De'Aaron Fox. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — De'Aaron Fox takes 5 categories while Aaron Wiggins claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the G position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

De'Aaron Fox's Assists Per Game of 6.1 compared to Aaron Wiggins's 1.4 represents a 335.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Aaron Wiggins falls 56.3% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while De'Aaron Fox exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for De'Aaron Fox's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Aaron Wiggins posts 48.7% against De'Aaron Fox's 47.2% — a gap of just 3.2%. Aaron Wiggins can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Aaron Wiggins side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

The verdict favors De'Aaron Fox — 5 categories to 3 — but Aaron Wiggins makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Aaron Wiggins has real statistical ammunition particularly in Field Goal % where the gap narrows to just 3.2%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.