Adam Mokoka or Aron Baynes? The NBA Stat Breakdown

The career statistics tell a clear story in this G comparison. Aron Baynes holds the advantage in 7 of 7 key categories, with Rebounds Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 557.1% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Aron Baynes's Rebounds Per Game of 4.6 compared to Adam Mokoka's 0.7 represents a 557.1% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Adam Mokoka falls 82.9% below the career average of 4.1 in this category while Aron Baynes exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Aron Baynes's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Adam Mokoka posts 40.0% against Aron Baynes's 48.9% — a gap of just 22.2%. Adam Mokoka can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 7-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Adam Mokoka side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Aron Baynes wins this head to head comparison decisively — 7 categories to 0. The 557.1% gap in Rebounds Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Aron Baynes's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.