Is Adonis Jordan Better Than Kris Dunn? NBA Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Adonis Jordan and Kris Dunn split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Adonis Jordan's Points Per Game of 21 compared to Kris Dunn's 7.6 represents a 176.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Kris Dunn falls 48.6% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Adonis Jordan exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Adonis Jordan's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Adonis Jordan posts 25% against Kris Dunn's 33.8% — a gap of just 35.2%. Kris Dunn can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Kris Dunn side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Adonis Jordan claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 176.3% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.