Adonis Jordan vs Steve Francis Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Adonis Jordan and Steve Francis split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Steve Francis's Assists Per Game of 6.0 compared to Adonis Jordan's 2.2 represents a 172.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Adonis Jordan falls 31.3% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while Steve Francis exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Steve Francis's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Rebounds Per Game, where Adonis Jordan posts 6 against Steve Francis's 5.6 — a gap of just 7.1%. Steve Francis can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Rebounds Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Steve Francis side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Steve Francis claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 172.7% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.