AJ Hammons vs Amar'e Stoudemire: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. AJ Hammons and Amar'e Stoudemire split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Amar'e Stoudemire's Rebounds Per Game of 7.8 compared to AJ Hammons's 1.6 represents a 387.5% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. AJ Hammons falls 79.7% below the career average of 7.9 in this category while Amar'e Stoudemire exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Amar'e Stoudemire's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Steals Per Game, where AJ Hammons posts 1 against Amar'e Stoudemire's 0.8 — a gap of just 25%. Amar'e Stoudemire can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Steals Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Amar'e Stoudemire side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Amar'e Stoudemire claims the tiebreaker through Rebounds Per Game advantage — a 387.5% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.