AJ Hammons or Jason Kidd? The NBA Stat Breakdown

This is as close as it gets. AJ Hammons and Jason Kidd split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Jason Kidd's Rebounds Per Game of 6.3 compared to AJ Hammons's 1.6 represents a 293.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. AJ Hammons falls 79.7% below the career average of 7.9 in this category while Jason Kidd exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Jason Kidd's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where AJ Hammons posts 40.5% against Jason Kidd's 40% — a gap of just 1.3%. Jason Kidd can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Jason Kidd side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Jason Kidd claims the tiebreaker through Rebounds Per Game advantage — a 293.7% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.