Is Al Horford Better Than Aleksandar Radojevic? NBA Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Al Horford and Aleksandar Radojevic split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Al Horford's Rebounds Per Game of 7.7 compared to Aleksandar Radojevic's 2.4 represents a 220.8% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Aleksandar Radojevic falls 69.6% below the career average of 7.9 in this category while Al Horford exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Al Horford's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Free Throw %, where Al Horford posts 76.4% against Aleksandar Radojevic's 62.5% — a gap of just 22.2%. Aleksandar Radojevic can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Free Throw % is the statistical ammunition for the Aleksandar Radojevic side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Al Horford claims the tiebreaker through Rebounds Per Game advantage — a 220.8% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.