Alan Williams vs Bostjan Nachbar Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Alan Williams and Bostjan Nachbar split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Alan Williams's Rebounds Per Game of 5.5 compared to Bostjan Nachbar's 2.6 represents a 111.5% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Bostjan Nachbar falls 67.1% below the career average of 7.9 in this category while Alan Williams exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Alan Williams's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Points Per Game, where Alan Williams posts 6.1 against Bostjan Nachbar's 7.1 — a gap of just 16.4%. Bostjan Nachbar can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Points Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Bostjan Nachbar side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Alan Williams claims the tiebreaker through Rebounds Per Game advantage — a 111.5% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.