Alan Williams or Peter Aluma? The NBA Stat Breakdown

This is as close as it gets. Alan Williams and Peter Aluma split the statistical categories evenly — 3 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Alan Williams's Points Per Game of 6.1 compared to Peter Aluma's 2 represents a 205% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Peter Aluma falls 82.5% below the career average of 11.4 in this category while Alan Williams exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Alan Williams's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Alan Williams posts 48.0% against Peter Aluma's 50% — a gap of just 4.2%. Peter Aluma can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Peter Aluma side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Alan Williams claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 205% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.