Alec Peters vs Blake Griffin: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Alec Peters and Blake Griffin split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested F comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Blake Griffin's Points Per Game of 19.0 compared to Alec Peters's 4.1 represents a 363.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Alec Peters falls 70.5% below the career average of 13.9 in this category while Blake Griffin exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Blake Griffin's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Alec Peters posts 31% against Blake Griffin's 32.8% — a gap of just 5.8%. Blake Griffin can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Blake Griffin side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Blake Griffin claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 363.4% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.