Is Alec Peters Better Than Draymond Green? NBA Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Alec Peters and Draymond Green split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested F comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Draymond Green's Rebounds Per Game of 6.8 compared to Alec Peters's 1.9 represents a 257.9% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Alec Peters falls 63.5% below the career average of 5.2 in this category while Draymond Green exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Draymond Green's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Alec Peters posts 31% against Draymond Green's 32.1% — a gap of just 3.5%. Draymond Green can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Draymond Green side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Draymond Green claims the tiebreaker through Rebounds Per Game advantage — a 257.9% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.