Comparing Allan Houston and Jeff McInnis Head to Head

The career statistics tell a clear story in this SG comparison. Allan Houston holds the advantage in 7 of 8 key categories, with Blocks Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 100% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Allan Houston's Blocks Per Game of 0.2 compared to Jeff McInnis's 0.1 represents a 100% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Allan Houston's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Allan Houston posts 44.4% against Jeff McInnis's 43.1% — a gap of just 3%. Jeff McInnis can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 7-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Jeff McInnis side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Allan Houston wins this head to head comparison decisively — 7 categories to 1. The 100% gap in Blocks Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Allan Houston's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.