Comparing Alton Lister and Yao Ming Head to Head

The career statistics tell a clear story in this C comparison. Yao Ming holds the advantage in 7 of 7 key categories, with Points Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 187.9% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Yao Ming's Points Per Game of 19.0 compared to Alton Lister's 6.6 represents a 187.9% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Alton Lister falls 42.1% below the career average of 11.4 in this category while Yao Ming exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Yao Ming's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Alton Lister posts 51.2% against Yao Ming's 52.4% — a gap of just 2.3%. Alton Lister can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 7-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Alton Lister side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

Yao Ming wins this head to head comparison decisively — 7 categories to 0. The 187.9% gap in Points Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Yao Ming's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.