Alvin Williams vs Marco Belinelli: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Alvin Williams and Marco Belinelli split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested PG comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Alvin Williams's Assists Per Game of 4.1 compared to Marco Belinelli's 1.7 represents a 141.2% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Marco Belinelli falls 70.7% below the career average of 5.8 in this category while Alvin Williams exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Alvin Williams's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Alvin Williams posts 42.1% against Marco Belinelli's 42.4% — virtually identical figures. Marco Belinelli can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Marco Belinelli side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Alvin Williams claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 141.2% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.