Is Amal McCaskill Better Than Andy Rautins? NBA Stats Decide

The career statistics tell a clear story in this C comparison. Andy Rautins holds the advantage in 5 of 7 key categories, with Assists Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 900% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Andy Rautins's Assists Per Game of 3 compared to Amal McCaskill's 0.3 represents a 900% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Amal McCaskill falls 83.3% below the career average of 1.8 in this category while Andy Rautins exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Andy Rautins's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Amal McCaskill posts 37.7% against Andy Rautins's 42.9% — a gap of just 13.8%. Amal McCaskill can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Amal McCaskill side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

Andy Rautins wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 2. The 900% gap in Assists Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Andy Rautins's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.