Comparing Amar'e Stoudemire and Blake Griffin Head to Head

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Amar'e Stoudemire vs Blake Griffin. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Blake Griffin takes 4 categories while Amar'e Stoudemire claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the C position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Blake Griffin's Assists Per Game of 4.0 compared to Amar'e Stoudemire's 1.2 represents a 233.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Amar'e Stoudemire falls 33.3% below the career average of 1.8 in this category while Blake Griffin exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Blake Griffin's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Points Per Game, where Amar'e Stoudemire posts 18.9 against Blake Griffin's 19.0 — virtually identical figures. Amar'e Stoudemire can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Points Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Amar'e Stoudemire side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

The verdict favors Blake Griffin — 4 categories to 3 — but Amar'e Stoudemire makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Amar'e Stoudemire has real statistical ammunition particularly in Points Per Game where the gap narrows to just 0.5%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.