Amar'e Stoudemire vs Donovan Clingan Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Amar'e Stoudemire and Donovan Clingan split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Amar'e Stoudemire's Points Per Game of 18.9 compared to Donovan Clingan's 9.7 represents a 94.8% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Donovan Clingan falls 14.9% below the career average of 11.4 in this category while Amar'e Stoudemire exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Amar'e Stoudemire's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Amar'e Stoudemire posts 53.7% against Donovan Clingan's 53% — a gap of just 1.3%. Donovan Clingan can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Donovan Clingan side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Amar'e Stoudemire claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 94.8% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.