Is Amar'e Stoudemire Better Than Mitchell Robinson? NBA Stats Decide
This is as close as it gets. Amar'e Stoudemire and Mitchell Robinson split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.
Amar'e Stoudemire's Points Per Game of 18.9 compared to Mitchell Robinson's 7.5 represents a 152% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Mitchell Robinson falls 34.2% below the career average of 11.4 in this category while Amar'e Stoudemire exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Amar'e Stoudemire's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Rebounds Per Game, where Amar'e Stoudemire posts 7.8 against Mitchell Robinson's 8.0 — a gap of just 2.6%. Mitchell Robinson can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Rebounds Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Mitchell Robinson side.
Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.
With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Amar'e Stoudemire claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 152% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.
Who is better, Amar'e Stoudemire or Mitchell Robinson?
Amar'e Stoudemire holds the statistical edge, winning 4 of 8 categories in this career comparison. Amar'e Stoudemire's Points Per Game of 18.9 versus Mitchell Robinson's 7.5 is the most decisive factor — a 152% difference.
How do Amar'e Stoudemire and Mitchell Robinson compare in Points Per Game?
Amar'e Stoudemire career Points Per Game: 18.9. Mitchell Robinson career Points Per Game: 7.5. Amar'e Stoudemire leads by 152% — dramatically ahead in this key C metric.
Who had the better overall career, Amar'e Stoudemire or Mitchell Robinson?
Based on career statistics, Amar'e Stoudemire edges Mitchell Robinson 4-4 across key categories. Amar'e Stoudemire's Points Per Game of 18.9 leads Mitchell Robinson's 7.5 by 152%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
