HEADtoHEADSTATS
Anderson Varejao
C · N/A
VS
NBA
Chandler Parsons
SF · N/A⚡ 5–3
Home→NBA→Anderson Varejao vs Chandler Parsons

Anderson Varejao or Chandler Parsons? The NBA Stat Breakdown

↓ Loses
Anderson Varejao
Anderson Varejao
C · N/A
VS
NBA
⚡ Winner
Chandler Parsons
Chandler Parsons
SF · N/A
Career Stats
7.2
Points Per Game
12.7
7.2
Rebounds Per Game
4.5
1.2
Assists Per Game
2.7
0.8
Steals Per Game
0.9
0.6
Blocks Per Game
0.3
50.9%
Field Goal %
46.2%
2.3%
Three Point %
37.3%
63%
Free Throw %
71.3%
Statistical Verdict
Chandler Parsons Wins
3–5
Category Wins
8 stats compared
Durability
Varejao
Games / 82
Parsons
✦Stats via ESPN · Regular season only · 70+ games = Healthy · 55–69 = Mild Risk · <55 = Injury Risk
🤖AI Analysis

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Anderson Varejao vs Chandler Parsons. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Chandler Parsons takes 5 categories while Anderson Varejao claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the C position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Chandler Parsons's Three Point % of 37.3% compared to Anderson Varejao's 2.3% represents a 1521.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Chandler Parsons's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Anderson Varejao posts 50.9% against Chandler Parsons's 46.2% — a gap of just 10.2%. Anderson Varejao can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Anderson Varejao side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

The verdict favors Chandler Parsons — 5 categories to 3 — but Anderson Varejao makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Anderson Varejao has real statistical ammunition particularly in Field Goal % where the gap narrows to just 10.2%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Anderson Varejao or Chandler Parsons?

Chandler Parsons holds the statistical edge, winning 5 of 8 categories in this career comparison. Chandler Parsons's Three Point % of 37.3% versus Anderson Varejao's 2.3% is the most decisive factor — a 1521.7% difference.

How do Anderson Varejao and Chandler Parsons compare in Three Point %?

Anderson Varejao career Three Point %: 2.3%. Chandler Parsons career Three Point %: 37.3%. Chandler Parsons leads by 1521.7% — dramatically ahead in this key C metric.

Who had the better overall career, Anderson Varejao or Chandler Parsons?

Based on career statistics, Chandler Parsons edges Anderson Varejao 5-3 across key categories. Chandler Parsons's Three Point % of 37.3% leads Anderson Varejao's 2.3% by 1521.7%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Anderson Varejao vs Chandler Parsons
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here