Andre Drummond vs Mark Bradtke Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Andre Drummond and Mark Bradtke split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Andre Drummond's Points Per Game of 12.1 compared to Mark Bradtke's 1.6 represents a 656.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Mark Bradtke falls 86% below the career average of 11.4 in this category while Andre Drummond exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Andre Drummond's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Andre Drummond posts 53.9% against Mark Bradtke's 43.1% — a gap of just 25.1%. Mark Bradtke can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Mark Bradtke side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Andre Drummond claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 656.3% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.