Andrew DeClercq vs Jeff McInnis: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Andrew DeClercq and Jeff McInnis split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Jeff McInnis's Assists Per Game of 4.4 compared to Andrew DeClercq's 0.6 represents a 633.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Andrew DeClercq falls 66.7% below the career average of 1.8 in this category while Jeff McInnis exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Jeff McInnis's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Steals Per Game, where Andrew DeClercq posts 0.7 against Jeff McInnis's 0.6 — a gap of just 16.7%. Jeff McInnis can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Steals Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Jeff McInnis side.

Centers have evolved dramatically across NBA eras — from dominant low-post scorers to modern stretch bigs. Career statistics must be evaluated with positional evolution and era context in mind.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Jeff McInnis claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 633.3% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.