Andrew Goudelock vs Dennis Rodman Career Stats Comparison

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Andrew Goudelock vs Dennis Rodman. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Dennis Rodman takes 5 categories while Andrew Goudelock claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the PG position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Dennis Rodman's Rebounds Per Game of 13.1 compared to Andrew Goudelock's 0.7 represents a 1771.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Andrew Goudelock falls 82.1% below the career average of 3.9 in this category while Dennis Rodman exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Dennis Rodman's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Andrew Goudelock posts 39.3% against Dennis Rodman's 52.1% — a gap of just 32.6%. Andrew Goudelock can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Andrew Goudelock side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

The verdict favors Dennis Rodman — 5 categories to 3 — but Andrew Goudelock makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Andrew Goudelock has real statistical ammunition particularly in Field Goal % where the gap narrows to just 32.6%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.