Andrew Nicholson vs Etdrick Bohannon Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Andrew Nicholson and Etdrick Bohannon split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested F comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Etdrick Bohannon's Assists Per Game of 6 compared to Andrew Nicholson's 0.4 represents a 1400% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Andrew Nicholson falls 85.7% below the career average of 2.8 in this category while Etdrick Bohannon exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Etdrick Bohannon's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Andrew Nicholson posts 46.7% against Etdrick Bohannon's 42.9% — a gap of just 8.9%. Etdrick Bohannon can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Etdrick Bohannon side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Etdrick Bohannon claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 1400% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.