Andrew Wiggins vs Alec Peters: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Andrew Wiggins and Alec Peters split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested F comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Alec Peters's Assists Per Game of 12 compared to Andrew Wiggins's 2.3 represents a 421.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Andrew Wiggins falls 17.9% below the career average of 2.8 in this category while Alec Peters exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Alec Peters's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Free Throw %, where Andrew Wiggins posts 72.8% against Alec Peters's 80% — a gap of just 9.9%. Alec Peters can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Free Throw % is the statistical ammunition for the Alec Peters side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Alec Peters claims the tiebreaker through Assists Per Game advantage — a 421.7% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.