Anthony Grundy or Zach LaVine? The NBA Stat Breakdown

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Anthony Grundy vs Zach LaVine. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Zach LaVine takes 4 categories while Anthony Grundy claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the PG position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Zach LaVine's Points Per Game of 20.7 compared to Anthony Grundy's 4.3 represents a 381.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Anthony Grundy falls 69.7% below the career average of 14.2 in this category while Zach LaVine exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Zach LaVine's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Anthony Grundy posts 50% against Zach LaVine's 47% — a gap of just 6.4%. Anthony Grundy can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Anthony Grundy side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

The verdict favors Zach LaVine — 4 categories to 3 — but Anthony Grundy makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Anthony Grundy has real statistical ammunition particularly in Field Goal % where the gap narrows to just 6.4%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.