Is Antonio McDyess Better Than Cade Cunningham? NBA Stats Decide

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Antonio McDyess vs Cade Cunningham. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Cade Cunningham takes 5 categories while Antonio McDyess claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the PF position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Cade Cunningham's Assists Per Game of 8.0 compared to Antonio McDyess's 1.3 represents a 515.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Antonio McDyess falls 38.1% below the career average of 2.1 in this category while Cade Cunningham exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Cade Cunningham's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Antonio McDyess posts 49.7% against Cade Cunningham's 44.9% — a gap of just 10.7%. Antonio McDyess can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Antonio McDyess side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

The verdict favors Cade Cunningham — 5 categories to 3 — but Antonio McDyess makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Antonio McDyess has real statistical ammunition particularly in Field Goal % where the gap narrows to just 10.7%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.