Is Arinze Onuaku Better Than Nikola Jokic? NBA Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Arinze Onuaku and Nikola Jokic split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested PF comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Nikola Jokic's Rebounds Per Game of 11.1 compared to Arinze Onuaku's 1.8 represents a 516.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Arinze Onuaku falls 73.5% below the career average of 6.8 in this category while Nikola Jokic exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Nikola Jokic's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Arinze Onuaku posts 65.2% against Nikola Jokic's 56.1% — a gap of just 16.2%. Nikola Jokic can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Nikola Jokic side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Nikola Jokic claims the tiebreaker through Rebounds Per Game advantage — a 516.7% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.