Arnett Moultrie vs Steve Nash: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Arnett Moultrie and Steve Nash split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested PF comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Steve Nash's Points Per Game of 14.3 compared to Arnett Moultrie's 3.6 represents a 297.2% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Arnett Moultrie falls 71.9% below the career average of 12.8 in this category while Steve Nash exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Steve Nash's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Rebounds Per Game, where Arnett Moultrie posts 3.1 against Steve Nash's 3.0 — a gap of just 3.3%. Steve Nash can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Rebounds Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Steve Nash side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Steve Nash claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 297.2% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.