Is Ben McLemore Better Than Draymond Green? NBA Stats Decide

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Ben McLemore vs Draymond Green. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Draymond Green takes 5 categories while Ben McLemore claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the SG position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Draymond Green's Assists Per Game of 5.6 compared to Ben McLemore's 1.0 represents a 460% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Ben McLemore falls 68.8% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while Draymond Green exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Draymond Green's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Points Per Game, where Ben McLemore posts 9.0 against Draymond Green's 8.7 — a gap of just 3.4%. Ben McLemore can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Points Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Ben McLemore side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

The verdict favors Draymond Green — 5 categories to 3 — but Ben McLemore makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Ben McLemore has real statistical ammunition particularly in Points Per Game where the gap narrows to just 3.4%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.