Bostjan Nachbar vs Cedric Simmons Career Stats Comparison

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Bostjan Nachbar vs Cedric Simmons. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Bostjan Nachbar takes 5 categories while Cedric Simmons claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the SF position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Cedric Simmons's Assists Per Game of 14 compared to Bostjan Nachbar's 0.9 represents a 1455.6% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Bostjan Nachbar falls 67.9% below the career average of 2.8 in this category while Cedric Simmons exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Cedric Simmons's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Bostjan Nachbar posts 40.6% against Cedric Simmons's 40.9% — virtually identical figures. Cedric Simmons can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Cedric Simmons side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

The verdict favors Bostjan Nachbar — 5 categories to 3 — but Cedric Simmons makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Cedric Simmons has real statistical ammunition particularly in Field Goal % where the gap narrows to just 0.7%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.