Is Brad Wanamaker Better Than Anthony Grundy? NBA Stats Decide

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Brad Wanamaker vs Anthony Grundy. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Anthony Grundy takes 4 categories while Brad Wanamaker claims 2, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the PG position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Anthony Grundy's Rebounds Per Game of 17 compared to Brad Wanamaker's 1.7 represents a 900% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Brad Wanamaker falls 56.4% below the career average of 3.9 in this category while Anthony Grundy exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Anthony Grundy's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Brad Wanamaker posts 30% against Anthony Grundy's 33.3% — a gap of just 11%. Brad Wanamaker can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Brad Wanamaker side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

The verdict favors Anthony Grundy — 4 categories to 2 — but Brad Wanamaker makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Brad Wanamaker has real statistical ammunition particularly in Three Point % where the gap narrows to just 11%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.