Brad Wanamaker vs Jamal Crawford: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

The career statistics tell a clear story in this PG comparison. Jamal Crawford holds the advantage in 5 of 7 key categories, with Points Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 165.5% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Jamal Crawford's Points Per Game of 14.6 compared to Brad Wanamaker's 5.5 represents a 165.5% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Brad Wanamaker falls 61.3% below the career average of 14.2 in this category while Jamal Crawford exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Jamal Crawford's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Brad Wanamaker posts 42.1% against Jamal Crawford's 41% — a gap of just 2.7%. Brad Wanamaker can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Brad Wanamaker side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Jamal Crawford wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 2. The 165.5% gap in Points Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Jamal Crawford's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.