Brad Wanamaker vs Marcus Fizer: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Brad Wanamaker and Marcus Fizer split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested PG comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Marcus Fizer's Rebounds Per Game of 4.6 compared to Brad Wanamaker's 1.7 represents a 170.6% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Brad Wanamaker falls 56.4% below the career average of 3.9 in this category while Marcus Fizer exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Marcus Fizer's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Brad Wanamaker posts 42.1% against Marcus Fizer's 43.5% — a gap of just 3.3%. Marcus Fizer can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Marcus Fizer side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Marcus Fizer claims the tiebreaker through Rebounds Per Game advantage — a 170.6% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.