Briante Weber or Mike McGee? The NBA Stat Breakdown

This is as close as it gets. Briante Weber and Mike McGee split the statistical categories evenly — 4 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested PG comparisons in NBA history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Mike McGee's Points Per Game of 9.7 compared to Briante Weber's 3.2 represents a 203.1% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Briante Weber falls 77.5% below the career average of 14.2 in this category while Mike McGee exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Mike McGee's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Briante Weber posts 40.8% against Mike McGee's 47.0% — a gap of just 15.2%. Mike McGee can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-4 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Mike McGee side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Mike McGee claims the tiebreaker through Points Per Game advantage — a 203.1% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NBA debate.