Bryce Drew vs Gilbert Arenas Career Stats Comparison

The career statistics tell a clear story in this G comparison. Gilbert Arenas holds the advantage in 6 of 8 key categories, with Points Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 370.5% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Gilbert Arenas's Points Per Game of 20.7 compared to Bryce Drew's 4.4 represents a 370.5% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Bryce Drew falls 70.3% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Gilbert Arenas exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Gilbert Arenas's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Free Throw %, where Bryce Drew posts 83% against Gilbert Arenas's 80.3% — a gap of just 3.4%. Bryce Drew can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 6-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Free Throw % is the statistical ammunition for the Bryce Drew side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Gilbert Arenas wins this head to head comparison decisively — 6 categories to 2. The 370.5% gap in Points Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Gilbert Arenas's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.