Cade Cunningham vs Patrick Ewing Career Stats Comparison

The career statistics tell a clear story in this G comparison. Cade Cunningham holds the advantage in 6 of 7 key categories, with Points Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 650% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Cade Cunningham's Points Per Game of 22.5 compared to Patrick Ewing's 3 represents a 650% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Patrick Ewing falls 79.7% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Cade Cunningham exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Cade Cunningham's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Free Throw %, where Cade Cunningham posts 84% against Patrick Ewing's 75% — a gap of just 12%. Patrick Ewing can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 6-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Free Throw % is the statistical ammunition for the Patrick Ewing side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Cade Cunningham wins this head to head comparison decisively — 6 categories to 1. The 650% gap in Points Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Cade Cunningham's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.