Cody Martin vs Metta World Peace Career Stats Comparison

The career statistics tell a clear story in this SF comparison. Metta World Peace holds the advantage in 7 of 8 key categories, with Points Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 116.4% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Metta World Peace's Points Per Game of 13.2 compared to Cody Martin's 6.1 represents a 116.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Cody Martin falls 56.1% below the career average of 13.9 in this category while Metta World Peace exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Metta World Peace's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Cody Martin posts 43.4% against Metta World Peace's 41.4% — a gap of just 4.8%. Cody Martin can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 7-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Cody Martin side.

The forward position in professional basketball demands versatility — the ability to score, rebound and defend at an elite level. The most decorated forwards in NBA history have excelled across multiple statistical categories.

Metta World Peace wins this head to head comparison decisively — 7 categories to 1. The 116.4% gap in Points Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Metta World Peace's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.