Malik Fitts or Patrick Ewing? The NBA Stat Breakdown

The career statistics tell a clear story in this G comparison. Patrick Ewing holds the advantage in 5 of 7 key categories, with Assists Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 900% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Patrick Ewing's Assists Per Game of 2 compared to Malik Fitts's 0.2 represents a 900% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Malik Fitts falls 93.8% below the career average of 3.2 in this category while Patrick Ewing exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Patrick Ewing's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Rebounds Per Game, where Malik Fitts posts 1.1 against Patrick Ewing's 2 — a gap of just 81.8%. Malik Fitts can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Rebounds Per Game is the statistical ammunition for the Malik Fitts side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Patrick Ewing wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 2. The 900% gap in Assists Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Patrick Ewing's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.